substack.com/@questioningx/note/c-71168216

Preview meta tags from the substack.com website.

Linked Hostnames

2

Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance

Google

https://substack.com/@questioningx/note/c-71168216

LX Cast (@questioningx)

I agree that current models are useful but not... interesting? It’s also telling that these AIs are ok at generating things, but fairly awful at collaborating. What I’m interested in are ways for humans to be the creativity engines and AI to augment those things. I’m never surprised when talking to a chatbot, unless it’s surprise at the things it still fails to do. As a musician, wouldn’t it be cool to come up with things and be able to play around with them without being either subsumed or having to spell things out in great detail? I think (still, after all these years) that without a somatic sense, muscle memory, feelings, many things about the way we operate aren’t “better-able” using AI. Not because humans are special, because biological complexity is special. And everything is connected. When models are about massive training data, a lot of dross creeps in. When companies building AIs are profit-focused in an environment where externalities are ignored, the AIs will reflect their designers’ worldviews.



Bing

LX Cast (@questioningx)

https://substack.com/@questioningx/note/c-71168216

I agree that current models are useful but not... interesting? It’s also telling that these AIs are ok at generating things, but fairly awful at collaborating. What I’m interested in are ways for humans to be the creativity engines and AI to augment those things. I’m never surprised when talking to a chatbot, unless it’s surprise at the things it still fails to do. As a musician, wouldn’t it be cool to come up with things and be able to play around with them without being either subsumed or having to spell things out in great detail? I think (still, after all these years) that without a somatic sense, muscle memory, feelings, many things about the way we operate aren’t “better-able” using AI. Not because humans are special, because biological complexity is special. And everything is connected. When models are about massive training data, a lot of dross creeps in. When companies building AIs are profit-focused in an environment where externalities are ignored, the AIs will reflect their designers’ worldviews.



DuckDuckGo

https://substack.com/@questioningx/note/c-71168216

LX Cast (@questioningx)

I agree that current models are useful but not... interesting? It’s also telling that these AIs are ok at generating things, but fairly awful at collaborating. What I’m interested in are ways for humans to be the creativity engines and AI to augment those things. I’m never surprised when talking to a chatbot, unless it’s surprise at the things it still fails to do. As a musician, wouldn’t it be cool to come up with things and be able to play around with them without being either subsumed or having to spell things out in great detail? I think (still, after all these years) that without a somatic sense, muscle memory, feelings, many things about the way we operate aren’t “better-able” using AI. Not because humans are special, because biological complexity is special. And everything is connected. When models are about massive training data, a lot of dross creeps in. When companies building AIs are profit-focused in an environment where externalities are ignored, the AIs will reflect their designers’ worldviews.

  • General Meta Tags

    14
    • title
      LX Cast (@questioningx): "I agree that current models are useful but not... interesting? It’s also telling that these AIs are ok at generating things, but fairly awful at collaborating. What I’m interested in are ways for humans to be the creativity engines and AI to augment those things. I’m never surpr…"
    • title
    • title
    • title
    • title
  • Open Graph Meta Tags

    9
    • og:url
      https://substack.com/@questioningx/note/c-71168216
    • og:image
      https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!XCt4!,w_400,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack.com%2Fimg%2Freader%2Fnotes-thumbnail.jpg
    • og:image:width
      400
    • og:image:height
      400
    • og:type
      article
  • Twitter Meta Tags

    8
    • twitter:image
      https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!XCt4!,w_400,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack.com%2Fimg%2Freader%2Fnotes-thumbnail.jpg
    • twitter:card
      summary
    • twitter:label1
      Likes
    • twitter:data1
      1
    • twitter:label2
      Replies
  • Link Tags

    17
    • alternate
      https://substack.com/@questioningx/note/c-71168216
    • apple-touch-icon
      https://substackcdn.com/icons/substack/apple-touch-icon.png
    • canonical
      https://substack.com/@questioningx/note/c-71168216
    • icon
      https://substackcdn.com/icons/substack/icon.svg
    • manifest
      /manifest.json

Links

5