substack.com/@thepg/note/c-103262913

Preview meta tags from the substack.com website.

Linked Hostnames

1

Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance

Google

https://substack.com/@thepg/note/c-103262913

PG (@thepg)

Totally agree with all you say there Mr. Jones. Herewith now a request for a future blog topic - the use or misuse of smileys and other emojis in business communication. If you'd asked me 10 years ago I'd have said 'no, no, and a third time, no!' But ACTUALLY (when brevity is an asset) they do have their place. Especially in multicultural communications. One can either write in legalese (and with much repetition) to avoid misunderstanding. And one must forego complex words (that might get understood) and use one's most basic English. But sometimes basic basic needs more words. Especially if a message needs to be softened. Or instead one can pepper an email that is liable to misunderstanding, or where there are delicate or diplomatic messages being delivered, with carefully placed emojis. I don't think the UK Foreign Office will take that path yet (at least not with all of partners) but I think in a hurried email, emojis can keep things short and guard against misunderstanding. Though Shakespeare would have been appalled! :)



Bing

PG (@thepg)

https://substack.com/@thepg/note/c-103262913

Totally agree with all you say there Mr. Jones. Herewith now a request for a future blog topic - the use or misuse of smileys and other emojis in business communication. If you'd asked me 10 years ago I'd have said 'no, no, and a third time, no!' But ACTUALLY (when brevity is an asset) they do have their place. Especially in multicultural communications. One can either write in legalese (and with much repetition) to avoid misunderstanding. And one must forego complex words (that might get understood) and use one's most basic English. But sometimes basic basic needs more words. Especially if a message needs to be softened. Or instead one can pepper an email that is liable to misunderstanding, or where there are delicate or diplomatic messages being delivered, with carefully placed emojis. I don't think the UK Foreign Office will take that path yet (at least not with all of partners) but I think in a hurried email, emojis can keep things short and guard against misunderstanding. Though Shakespeare would have been appalled! :)



DuckDuckGo

https://substack.com/@thepg/note/c-103262913

PG (@thepg)

Totally agree with all you say there Mr. Jones. Herewith now a request for a future blog topic - the use or misuse of smileys and other emojis in business communication. If you'd asked me 10 years ago I'd have said 'no, no, and a third time, no!' But ACTUALLY (when brevity is an asset) they do have their place. Especially in multicultural communications. One can either write in legalese (and with much repetition) to avoid misunderstanding. And one must forego complex words (that might get understood) and use one's most basic English. But sometimes basic basic needs more words. Especially if a message needs to be softened. Or instead one can pepper an email that is liable to misunderstanding, or where there are delicate or diplomatic messages being delivered, with carefully placed emojis. I don't think the UK Foreign Office will take that path yet (at least not with all of partners) but I think in a hurried email, emojis can keep things short and guard against misunderstanding. Though Shakespeare would have been appalled! :)

  • General Meta Tags

    14
    • title
      PG (@thepg): "Totally agree with all you say there Mr. Jones. Herewith now a request for a future blog topic - the use or misuse of smileys and other emojis in business communication. If you'd asked me 10 years ago I'd have said 'no, no, and a third time, no!' But ACTUALLY (when brevity is an…"
    • title
    • title
    • title
    • title
  • Open Graph Meta Tags

    9
    • og:url
      https://substack.com/@thepg/note/c-103262913
    • og:image
      https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!XCt4!,w_400,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack.com%2Fimg%2Freader%2Fnotes-thumbnail.jpg
    • og:image:width
      400
    • og:image:height
      400
    • og:type
      article
  • Twitter Meta Tags

    8
    • twitter:image
      https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!XCt4!,w_400,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack.com%2Fimg%2Freader%2Fnotes-thumbnail.jpg
    • twitter:card
      summary
    • twitter:label1
      Likes
    • twitter:data1
      1
    • twitter:label2
      Replies
  • Link Tags

    34
    • alternate
      https://substack.com/@thepg/note/c-103262913
    • apple-touch-icon
      https://substackcdn.com/icons/substack/apple-touch-icon.png
    • canonical
      https://substack.com/@thepg/note/c-103262913
    • icon
      https://substackcdn.com/icons/substack/icon.svg
    • manifest
      /manifest.json

Links

4