
benn.substack.com/p/take-the-down-round/comment/39595673
Preview meta tags from the benn.substack.com website.
Linked Hostnames
4- 12 links tosubstack.com
- 7 links tobenn.substack.com
- 1 link togroupby1.mattarderne.com
- 1 link towww.cascade.io
Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance
Benn Stancil on benn.substack
Eh, I don't know if there's really some VC angle for pushing that narrative; honestly, it mostly just strikes me as lazy. It's a lot easier to write posts about how bad this extreme thing is than to talk about nuance. So my guess is the "angle" is really, "I want to become a VC influencer and I need to write content." On product, I never used Dataform, so I'll take your word for it on the experience. That said, I don't think the money had much do with it. Looking back, the acquisition got announced in early Dec of 2020, less than a month after dbt announced their series B. Acquisitions take some time from first conversation to announcement, so the deal was probably in the works either when dbt had only raised $13m in their A. Even if they had wind of the B when they started talking with Google, the B was only $30m, which isn't small, but hardly enough to corner an entire market. So I'd argue that datafold either sold because dbt already had the community traction *without* the money, or datafold's product simply didn't have that much appeal. (There's a third argument here that they sold because dbt cornered the *VCs market*, either because VCs didn't want to bet against it, or something more collude-y, where VCs already had a horse in the race. The former seems possible; the latter, eh, probably less.) On the ecosystem, in thinking a bit more about it, that seems like it depends mostly on the value of the underlying thing. Crypto was mostly a waste because the foundation didn't have much value. For data stuff, is that true? Perhaps more than we'd like to admit, but less so than crypto, I'd hope.
Bing
Benn Stancil on benn.substack
Eh, I don't know if there's really some VC angle for pushing that narrative; honestly, it mostly just strikes me as lazy. It's a lot easier to write posts about how bad this extreme thing is than to talk about nuance. So my guess is the "angle" is really, "I want to become a VC influencer and I need to write content." On product, I never used Dataform, so I'll take your word for it on the experience. That said, I don't think the money had much do with it. Looking back, the acquisition got announced in early Dec of 2020, less than a month after dbt announced their series B. Acquisitions take some time from first conversation to announcement, so the deal was probably in the works either when dbt had only raised $13m in their A. Even if they had wind of the B when they started talking with Google, the B was only $30m, which isn't small, but hardly enough to corner an entire market. So I'd argue that datafold either sold because dbt already had the community traction *without* the money, or datafold's product simply didn't have that much appeal. (There's a third argument here that they sold because dbt cornered the *VCs market*, either because VCs didn't want to bet against it, or something more collude-y, where VCs already had a horse in the race. The former seems possible; the latter, eh, probably less.) On the ecosystem, in thinking a bit more about it, that seems like it depends mostly on the value of the underlying thing. Crypto was mostly a waste because the foundation didn't have much value. For data stuff, is that true? Perhaps more than we'd like to admit, but less so than crypto, I'd hope.
DuckDuckGo

Benn Stancil on benn.substack
Eh, I don't know if there's really some VC angle for pushing that narrative; honestly, it mostly just strikes me as lazy. It's a lot easier to write posts about how bad this extreme thing is than to talk about nuance. So my guess is the "angle" is really, "I want to become a VC influencer and I need to write content." On product, I never used Dataform, so I'll take your word for it on the experience. That said, I don't think the money had much do with it. Looking back, the acquisition got announced in early Dec of 2020, less than a month after dbt announced their series B. Acquisitions take some time from first conversation to announcement, so the deal was probably in the works either when dbt had only raised $13m in their A. Even if they had wind of the B when they started talking with Google, the B was only $30m, which isn't small, but hardly enough to corner an entire market. So I'd argue that datafold either sold because dbt already had the community traction *without* the money, or datafold's product simply didn't have that much appeal. (There's a third argument here that they sold because dbt cornered the *VCs market*, either because VCs didn't want to bet against it, or something more collude-y, where VCs already had a horse in the race. The former seems possible; the latter, eh, probably less.) On the ecosystem, in thinking a bit more about it, that seems like it depends mostly on the value of the underlying thing. Crypto was mostly a waste because the foundation didn't have much value. For data stuff, is that true? Perhaps more than we'd like to admit, but less so than crypto, I'd hope.
General Meta Tags
21- titleComments - Take the down round - by Benn Stancil
- title
- title
- title
- title
Open Graph Meta Tags
7- og:urlhttps://benn.substack.com/p/take-the-down-round/comment/39595673
- og:imagehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!Jlr7!,f_auto,q_auto:best,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbenn.substack.com%2Ftwitter%2Fsubscribe-card.jpg%3Fv%3D-637874724%26version%3D9
- og:typearticle
- og:titleBenn Stancil on benn.substack
- og:descriptionEh, I don't know if there's really some VC angle for pushing that narrative; honestly, it mostly just strikes me as lazy. It's a lot easier to write posts about how bad this extreme thing is than to talk about nuance. So my guess is the "angle" is really, "I want to become a VC influencer and I need to write content." On product, I never used Dataform, so I'll take your word for it on the experience. That said, I don't think the money had much do with it. Looking back, the acquisition got announced in early Dec of 2020, less than a month after dbt announced their series B. Acquisitions take some time from first conversation to announcement, so the deal was probably in the works either when dbt had only raised $13m in their A. Even if they had wind of the B when they started talking with Google, the B was only $30m, which isn't small, but hardly enough to corner an entire market. So I'd argue that datafold either sold because dbt already had the community traction *without* the money, or datafold's product simply didn't have that much appeal. (There's a third argument here that they sold because dbt cornered the *VCs market*, either because VCs didn't want to bet against it, or something more collude-y, where VCs already had a horse in the race. The former seems possible; the latter, eh, probably less.) On the ecosystem, in thinking a bit more about it, that seems like it depends mostly on the value of the underlying thing. Crypto was mostly a waste because the foundation didn't have much value. For data stuff, is that true? Perhaps more than we'd like to admit, but less so than crypto, I'd hope.
Twitter Meta Tags
8- twitter:imagehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!Jlr7!,f_auto,q_auto:best,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbenn.substack.com%2Ftwitter%2Fsubscribe-card.jpg%3Fv%3D-637874724%26version%3D9
- twitter:cardsummary_large_image
- twitter:label1Likes
- twitter:data10
- twitter:label2Replies
Link Tags
21- alternate/feed
- apple-touch-iconhttps://substackcdn.com/icons/substack/apple-touch-icon.png
- canonicalhttps://benn.substack.com/p/take-the-down-round/comment/39595673
- iconhttps://substackcdn.com/icons/substack/icon.svg
- preconnecthttps://substackcdn.com
Links
21- https://benn.substack.com
- https://benn.substack.com/p/take-the-down-round/comment/39595673
- https://benn.substack.com/p/take-the-down-round/comment/39598378
- https://benn.substack.com/p/take-the-down-round/comment/39600463
- https://benn.substack.com/p/take-the-down-round/comment/39651726