fp21.substack.com/p/a-new-standard-for-public-diplomacy/comment/146297575

Preview meta tags from the fp21.substack.com website.

Linked Hostnames

3

Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance

Google

https://fp21.substack.com/p/a-new-standard-for-public-diplomacy/comment/146297575

Dan Spokojny on Foreign Policy Expertise

Your point is interesting — “studiously divorce outcomes from inputs.” Can you say more about how to assess that a decision-making process or a risk assessment is “high-quality” without any reference to outputs? I wonder if this approach simply smuggles in intuitive and idiosyncratic beliefs about outcomes without making them explicit or evaluable.



Bing

Dan Spokojny on Foreign Policy Expertise

https://fp21.substack.com/p/a-new-standard-for-public-diplomacy/comment/146297575

Your point is interesting — “studiously divorce outcomes from inputs.” Can you say more about how to assess that a decision-making process or a risk assessment is “high-quality” without any reference to outputs? I wonder if this approach simply smuggles in intuitive and idiosyncratic beliefs about outcomes without making them explicit or evaluable.



DuckDuckGo

https://fp21.substack.com/p/a-new-standard-for-public-diplomacy/comment/146297575

Dan Spokojny on Foreign Policy Expertise

Your point is interesting — “studiously divorce outcomes from inputs.” Can you say more about how to assess that a decision-making process or a risk assessment is “high-quality” without any reference to outputs? I wonder if this approach simply smuggles in intuitive and idiosyncratic beliefs about outcomes without making them explicit or evaluable.

  • General Meta Tags

    19
    • title
      Comments - "Old" versus "New" Public Diplomacy
    • title
    • title
    • title
    • title
  • Open Graph Meta Tags

    7
    • og:url
      https://fp21.substack.com/p/a-new-standard-for-public-diplomacy/comment/146297575
    • og:image
      https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!_IhB!,f_auto,q_auto:best,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Ffp21.substack.com%2Ftwitter%2Fsubscribe-card.jpg%3Fv%3D-438142420%26version%3D9
    • og:type
      article
    • og:title
      Dan Spokojny on Foreign Policy Expertise
    • og:description
      Your point is interesting — “studiously divorce outcomes from inputs.” Can you say more about how to assess that a decision-making process or a risk assessment is “high-quality” without any reference to outputs? I wonder if this approach simply smuggles in intuitive and idiosyncratic beliefs about outcomes without making them explicit or evaluable.
  • Twitter Meta Tags

    8
    • twitter:image
      https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!_IhB!,f_auto,q_auto:best,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Ffp21.substack.com%2Ftwitter%2Fsubscribe-card.jpg%3Fv%3D-438142420%26version%3D9
    • twitter:card
      summary_large_image
    • twitter:label1
      Likes
    • twitter:data1
      0
    • twitter:label2
      Replies
  • Link Tags

    34
    • alternate
      /feed
    • apple-touch-icon
      https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!X2Ic!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F915ce34c-2366-4640-8df6-220c0aa7b9a4%2Fapple-touch-icon-57x57.png
    • apple-touch-icon
      https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!wjsq!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F915ce34c-2366-4640-8df6-220c0aa7b9a4%2Fapple-touch-icon-60x60.png
    • apple-touch-icon
      https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!zcv3!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F915ce34c-2366-4640-8df6-220c0aa7b9a4%2Fapple-touch-icon-72x72.png
    • apple-touch-icon
      https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!zEF1!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F915ce34c-2366-4640-8df6-220c0aa7b9a4%2Fapple-touch-icon-76x76.png

Links

18