fp21.substack.com/p/a-new-standard-for-public-diplomacy/comment/146297575
Preview meta tags from the fp21.substack.com website.
Linked Hostnames
3Thumbnail

Search Engine Appearance
Dan Spokojny on Foreign Policy Expertise
Your point is interesting — “studiously divorce outcomes from inputs.” Can you say more about how to assess that a decision-making process or a risk assessment is “high-quality” without any reference to outputs? I wonder if this approach simply smuggles in intuitive and idiosyncratic beliefs about outcomes without making them explicit or evaluable.
Bing
Dan Spokojny on Foreign Policy Expertise
Your point is interesting — “studiously divorce outcomes from inputs.” Can you say more about how to assess that a decision-making process or a risk assessment is “high-quality” without any reference to outputs? I wonder if this approach simply smuggles in intuitive and idiosyncratic beliefs about outcomes without making them explicit or evaluable.
DuckDuckGo
Dan Spokojny on Foreign Policy Expertise
Your point is interesting — “studiously divorce outcomes from inputs.” Can you say more about how to assess that a decision-making process or a risk assessment is “high-quality” without any reference to outputs? I wonder if this approach simply smuggles in intuitive and idiosyncratic beliefs about outcomes without making them explicit or evaluable.
General Meta Tags
19- titleComments - "Old" versus "New" Public Diplomacy
- title
- title
- title
- title
Open Graph Meta Tags
7- og:urlhttps://fp21.substack.com/p/a-new-standard-for-public-diplomacy/comment/146297575
- og:imagehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!_IhB!,f_auto,q_auto:best,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Ffp21.substack.com%2Ftwitter%2Fsubscribe-card.jpg%3Fv%3D-438142420%26version%3D9
- og:typearticle
- og:titleDan Spokojny on Foreign Policy Expertise
- og:descriptionYour point is interesting — “studiously divorce outcomes from inputs.” Can you say more about how to assess that a decision-making process or a risk assessment is “high-quality” without any reference to outputs? I wonder if this approach simply smuggles in intuitive and idiosyncratic beliefs about outcomes without making them explicit or evaluable.
Twitter Meta Tags
8- twitter:imagehttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!_IhB!,f_auto,q_auto:best,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Ffp21.substack.com%2Ftwitter%2Fsubscribe-card.jpg%3Fv%3D-438142420%26version%3D9
- twitter:cardsummary_large_image
- twitter:label1Likes
- twitter:data10
- twitter:label2Replies
Link Tags
34- alternate/feed
- apple-touch-iconhttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!X2Ic!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F915ce34c-2366-4640-8df6-220c0aa7b9a4%2Fapple-touch-icon-57x57.png
- apple-touch-iconhttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!wjsq!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F915ce34c-2366-4640-8df6-220c0aa7b9a4%2Fapple-touch-icon-60x60.png
- apple-touch-iconhttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!zcv3!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F915ce34c-2366-4640-8df6-220c0aa7b9a4%2Fapple-touch-icon-72x72.png
- apple-touch-iconhttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!zEF1!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F915ce34c-2366-4640-8df6-220c0aa7b9a4%2Fapple-touch-icon-76x76.png
Links
18- https://fp21.substack.com
- https://fp21.substack.com/p/a-new-standard-for-public-diplomacy/comment/146297575
- https://fp21.substack.com/p/a-new-standard-for-public-diplomacy/comment/146354923
- https://fp21.substack.com/p/a-new-standard-for-public-diplomacy/comment/146731932
- https://fp21.substack.com/p/a-new-standard-for-public-diplomacy/comments#comment-146297575